How a Hit and Run Arrest is Made in Greenwich
The first thing an officer will do when making a hit and run arrest in Greenwich is an attempt to identify the person who fled the scene. They will likely do that by trying to see if they can identify the license plate number of the operator or otherwise have any other identifying information about the operator.
Once they identify who the operator is, the officer will make contact with that person either by calling them or by making an arrest immediately upon seeing them. A skilled hit and run attorney can help you get a better understanding of how an evading responsibility arrest is made in Greenwich.
Warranting an Arrest
There just must be probable cause that needs to be either presented to a judge ahead of time in the process of applying for and obtaining an arrest warrant or that is detailed in the criminal complaint or criminal police report so that when a person is presented for arraignment, the judge has an opportunity to see if there is probable cause for the arrest at that moment.
How an evading responsibility arrest is made in Greenwich includes an officer applying for an arrest warrant, they would be presenting the evidence the officer has and the judge would ahead of time declare that there is or is not probable cause.
If the officer makes an arrest before applying for and getting issued a warrant, then the judge will eventually make a decision as to whether there was actually probable cause and that would be done at the person’s arraignment in court, which is their first court date.
Defining the Procedure
The indication is a part of how an evading responsibility arrest is made in Greenwich. An officer would have to indicate that they asked the individual to stop, pull over, or indicate that they want the person to stop what they are doing and then the officer would place the person under arrest by physically taking them into custody and informing the person of the charges against them.
They should also be notifying the individual of their constitutional rights at the time of arrest. It should be made clear to the individual that they are under arrest. However, the charges could result in the exclusion of certain evidence if those procedures are not followed.
If the officer did not have the essential evidence to constitute the crime and arrest the person anyway or did not have probable cause to believe that the person committed the crime, then it would be an unlawful arrest.
If in the process of the arrest, the officer did not execute the arrest appropriately, there could be portions of the arrest that was unlawful. However, that would not necessarily result in the dismissal or dropping of the charges because the way in which an officer conducts an arrest does not necessarily negate the events that took place that actually led to the charges.