Stamford Theft Consequences
Stamford theft consequences can range from lower level misdemeanors all the way up to some of the most serious felonies. The types of consequences that would be possible for somebody charged with larceny or theft is imprisonment, fines, probation, or any combination of those three. If you are facing these penalties, it is imperative you speak with a distinguished theft attorney.
Harshest Conviction Penalty
If an individual is convicted of the most serious version of larceny or theft, they would be exposing themselves to a Class B felony. Class B felony would expose that person to a potential term of imprisonment of up to 20 years. That person would be exposed to a potential fine of up to $15,000 and a potential term of probation of up to five years.
If the circumstances of the crime place it within the realm of a Class B Felony, then the person could face up to 20 years imprisonment, up to five years’ probation, a fine up to $15,000, and possibly having to pay back the victim for anything that was taken.
Classifying Theft Consequences
Depending on the level, theft charges can range from a Class D Felony all the way up to a Class B Felony. For any of those charges, the possible Stamford theft consequences all include potential jail time, probation, and a fine.
The only difference in any combination of those three is the amount of potential prison time, the amount of potential probation, and the amount of potential fines that maybe imposed depending on the level of crime that is being charged.
The other thing is that anybody convicted of a larceny can expect the judge to order them to return the stolen property, if possible, or reimburse the victim for the value of the property that was taken.
Stamford theft consequences for felony offenses are the same as misdemeanor theft, only worse. There is a greater likelihood for imprisonment and a more substantial period of probation. Other than that, everything is the same.
Defining Penalties for a Misdemeanor Offense
Stamford theft consequences for a misdemeanor offense are prison time, probation, a fine, or any combination of those three. There is the potential of having to pay the victim for the value of the property taken. There are always more irrelevant consequences not set by the judge and not a punishment that is stated in the law, but as a result of having a criminal record.
What if someone has a Criminal Record?
Somebody that has a criminal record showing a theft charge or a theft conviction, even if it is a misdemeanor, is going to be looked at with more scrutiny by potential employers, potential organizations, and clubs at which membership is applied for.
Somebody that has a theft conviction may be looked at with some level of suspicion by others. It is important to aware of Stamford theft consequences and to avoid a theft conviction in any way possible.
If there is going to be a conviction, the plan would be to try to make it the lowest version of a charge as possible and that the punishment is mitigated as much as it can be.
Impact of a Prior Conviction
Prior criminal convictions make it more difficult to resolve the current case. The defendant is less likely to get leniency from the judge or prosecutor for any possible plea deal. The judge or prosecutor will be looking for more potential prison time, a longer period of probation and/or a higher fine. Stamford theft consequences may be more significant in this instance because of what had happened in the past.
It could be a misdemeanor all three times, but on the third time the prosecutor will consider the third charge and the third conviction to be a Class D Felony, even if the level of the charge would only be a misdemeanor, because they would be deemed a Persistent Larceny Offender.
Likelihood of Lenient Punishments
A defendant with no history of larceny, having the exact same charge, is more likely to receive a lenient punishment, or at least an offer or plea deal to receive a more lenient punishment. Another obstacle is a designation called “Persistent Larceny Offender”.
Not only do the past instances of larceny potentially make the punishment worse based on the fact that the judge or prosecutor may not be as lenient, but there is actually a law that states that anytime somebody who has been convicted two prior times of larceny, if they get a third conviction, it automatically