Contact Us

Case Evaluation

Stamford Drug Distribution Lawyer

The Stamford Police Department has been setting up sting operations and trying to closely monitor any areas in which known drug transactions or drug activity is occurring to try to catch people and prevent them from distributing drugs.

Cases with serious drugs like heroin or fentanyl can lead to overdoses and deaths which mean they are taken seriously by law enforcement. The severity of drug distribution crimes is that those intending to sell are not only affecting themselves but other people around them as well.

If you have been accused of intent to distribute, speak with a Stamford drug distribution lawyer. An established drug attorney could help you defend your rights and reputation throughout trial.

Aggravating Factors to Distribution Charges

The amount of drugs being distributed can be considered an aggravating factor in someone’s case. Selling five bags isT going to look at more favorably than selling 500, for instance. Whether or not the person that is buying the drugs overdoses or gets hurt or causes someone else to get hurt, that is an aggravating factor as well.

The most common aggravating factor that the Stamford police try to charge, though, is when someone is non-drug dependent and is distributing drugs. That makes it a serious felony and it comes with five years of mandatory minimum jail time if the person is convicted or pleads guilty to distribution of drugs by a non-drug dependent person.

Common Constitutional Issues in Drug Distribution Cases

Stamford drug distribution lawyers have seen issues with Fourth Amendment for a potential illegal search or seizure. If the police conduct a search without a warrant and without a person’s consent, the first thing that the defense attorney should be doing is looking into whether there was an exception to the necessity for a warrant under the Fourth Amendment or whether their client’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the search.

Types of Evidence from the Prosecution’s Case

The prosecution could use testimony from other people. In a lot of cases, there might be an undercover officer seeking to buy drugs from the person being charged, or it could be someone else who has been arrested and who is cooperating with the police, or it could be based on the police officer’s testimony if they observed the transaction actually taking place. Those accused should speak with a Stamford drug distribution lawyer about potentially combatting the prosecution’s case.

Highly Contested Elements of a Distribution Trial

Typically, the most contested is intent to sell. If someone was found to be in possession of a large quantity of drugs and the police didn’t actually see them sell or distribute any but they have a witness come in and testify to that fact, and the prosecutor is asking the jury to infer that the person had the intent to sell, intent is typically highly contested because there is no eyewitness testimony that is going to prove that and the defendant is often saying that the drugs might have been for personal use but there was no intent to distribute them.

Seeking a Lawyer

It may be critical for individuals seeking legal counsel to speak with an attorney who is familiar with the drug charges in Connecticut as well as the types of drugs that the police are cracking down on as well as someone that is familiar with Stamford Superior Court, the Stamford Police Department, and that has experience defending these cases.