Contact Us

Case Evaluation
close

Role of the Prosecution in Greenwich Evading Responsibility Cases

If you have been charged with a hit and run traffic violation, it could be critical to understand the role of the prosecution in Greenwich evading responsibility cases. Once an attorney files an Appearance on someone’s behalf in Stamford Superior Court, the attorney is the one negotiating with the prosecutor, not the potential client. It is never a good idea for the accused to talk to the Prosecutor because they may accidentally say something which will incriminate them further or give the Prosecutor more evidence to use against them.

It is a much better idea for a well-versed evading responsibility lawyer to go in on behalf of the potential client and directly speak with the prosecutor and represent the individual’s best interest. If the case is resolved with either the person is pleading guilty or being found guilty, then the DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) will send them a letter advising them that their driver’s license will be suspended for 90 days as a result of the conviction.

Risk of Meeting with the Prosecutor Without Legal Representation

The role of the prosecution in Greenwich evading responsibility cases is to seek conviction. A person should not meet with the prosecutor or show up to court without proper legal representation. They should always go with an attorney to make sure they are represented and their rights are protected. People have a tendency to think that because it is a motor vehicle crime that they are able to represent themselves and take care of it without having to hire an attorney.

What often happens is when the person goes in to speak with the Prosecutor, they end up saying things that actually incriminate them further. They accidentally give the Prosecutor more evidence to be used against them. That is why they should have an attorney present when they are trying to tell their side of the story because they do not realize they are actually saying things that can help show their guilt.

What is the Prosecution’s Goal in Hit and Run Cases?

The prosecutor’s main concerns are always trying to figure out what the reason was that this person did a hit and run or leave the scene of the accident. They want to know what else was going on that made the person scared to stay at the scene of the accident. They want to know whether they are having some problems with the DMV, whether they were committing a DUI, or whether they were just scared. The prosecution wants to know the reasons why the person left and they are going to be concerned with making sure that any of those reasons are taken care of before they let the case go.

The main concern of the prosecutors is that they have the person and that they might be under the influence of alcohol and drugs. They are obviously concerned that the person may have committed a DUI but did not get caught because they left the scene of the accident. That is the main reason they have concern and an experienced defense attorney will know how to alleviate that concern by showing them proof of treatment, proof a substance abuse evaluation, or some other documentation for the prosecutor to put in their file to feel comfortable about moving forward in the case and resolving it.

How an Attorney Can Advocate in Evading Responsibility Cases

Depending on the role of the prosecution in Greenwich evading responsibility cases, the defense attorney can try showing documentation as to why those concerns to be alleviated. Some prosecutors have concerns that the person had an expired license, or no license, or that their license is suspended.

The role of the defense attorney would be to obtain all the documentation and show the license is probably restored if that is the case. If it is an insurance issue, the defense attorney should gather documentation to show that the car was fully insured on the day in question. Whatever the concern of the prosecution is, a criminal lawyer should be able to gather the documentation and counter that concern to help the case be resolved favorably for the accused.